Compare

Model vs model

Pick up to 4 models, at one effort or their best, and see them side by side: the Index and every test, level by level on the same cubes, moves, time, tokens, cost, how effort changes them, and the coding benchmark. Every chart and card downloads as an image.

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic · xhigh effort Verified

Fast Index
88.5#1 of 64
Thorough
–not run
Coding
76.2#1 of 15 · 2 runs
Moves / solve
35.568 cubes solved
Cost (Fast)
$15612h 44m

GPT-6-Astra

OpenAI · max effort Verified

Fast Index
87.5#2 of 64
Thorough
–not run
Coding
76.0#2 of 15
Moves / solve
45.166 cubes solved
Cost (Fast)
$523h 29m

Head to head

Every measure side by side; the best on each row is marked. Averages where an effort was run more than once.

MeasureClaude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)GPT-6-Astra (max)
Rows won123
Fast suite
Fast Index88.587.5
Rank on the Fast Index#1 of 64#2 of 64
4×4 Gauntlet4×4 played4×4 played
2×2 ladder, interactive100 · L11/11100 · L11/11
3×3 ladder, interactive100 · L20/20100 · L20/20
3×3 ladder, one-shot100 · L20/20100 · L20/20
4×4 Gauntlet, interactive40.0 · L8/2035.0 · L7/20
4×4 Gauntlet, one-shot45.0 · L9/2040.0 · L8/20
Cubes solved6866
Moves on the shared cubes2173 on 64 levels2715 on 64 levels
Moves per cube solved35.545.1
Time12h 44m3h 29m
Input tokens72.7M27.3M
Output tokens5.3M337k
Cost$156$52
Cost per Index point$1.77$0.59
Minutes per Index point8.62.4
Runs averaged11
Score range over runsone run80.0–87.5
Coding benchmark
Coding score76.276.0
Coding score, mean of runs61.376.0
Rank on the coding board#1 of 15#2 of 15
Hidden cubes solved50/5050/50
Moves per cube (solver)78.879
Solve time per cube25 s54 s
Coding time used2h 55m3h 52m
Coding cost$9.51$44

Costs marked * are estimated from tokens at list prices. Ties share the mark.

Fast, test by test

Each test out of 100. The Index weighs the 2×2 ladder 20% and each 3×3 ladder 30%. A perfect 100 on all three unlocks the 4×4 Gauntlet: two 4×4 ladders of 20 levels, worth 10% each. Without it, 80 is the top score.

Fast Index

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)88.5
GPT-6-Astra (max)87.5

2×2 ladder, interactive

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)100
GPT-6-Astra (max)100

3×3 ladder, interactive

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)100
GPT-6-Astra (max)100

3×3 ladder, one-shot

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)100
GPT-6-Astra (max)100

4×4 Gauntlet, interactive

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)40.0
GPT-6-Astra (max)35.0

4×4 Gauntlet, one-shot

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)45.0
GPT-6-Astra (max)40.0

Level by level

Every level of each ladder, from each model's best run. The number is the moves it took; red marks are missed tries. Everyone gets the same cube on a level's first try, so the fewest moves there is starred. Click a level for its replay.

2×2 ladder, interactive

1234567891011Score
Claude Opus 5.5xhigh123456★2123172211100
GPT-6-Astramax123452217★21★16★17★11100

3×3 ladder, interactive

3×3 ladder, one-shot

1234567891011121314151617181920Score
Claude Opus 5.5xhigh1234567★8★899088123106999593★89103★72★75★100
GPT-6-Astramax123456838585★74★53★103★81★92★959483★1079598100

4×4 Gauntlet, interactive · 20 levels

1234567891011121314151617181920Score
Claude Opus 5.5xhigh12345614★8•✕40.0
GPT-6-Astramax1234537•43✕35.0

4×4 Gauntlet, one-shot · 20 levels

1234567891011121314151617181920Score
Claude Opus 5.5xhigh1234568815••✕45.0
GPT-6-Astramax1234567★8✕40.0
  • solved first try
  • solved after a miss
  • missed, the ladder ended
  • not reached

Does more effort help?

The Fast Index at every effort each model has been run at, whichever effort is picked above.

  • Claude Opus 5.5
  • GPT-6-Astra

Coding benchmark

Each model writes its own 5×5 solver in a few hours, then the frozen code solves hidden cubes. 100 = the 60-move reference; an unsolved cube scores 0.

Each run: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh) 76.2, 46.4

Claude Opus 5.5 · GPT-6-Astra · The Index · Coding board